
16 March
1946
Dear General Hobbs:
Now that I am leaving the service, I thought it might be well to
give you the following information for whatever satisfaction you
might derive there from.
I was historian of the ETO. Toward the end of last fall, for the
purpose of breaking the log-jam of paper concerning division
presidential unit citations, General Eisenhower instructed me to
draw up a rating sheet on the divisions. This entailed in the actual
processing that we had to go over the total work of all the more
experienced divisions, infantry and armor, and report back to him
which divisions we considered had performed the most efficient and
consistent battle services.
We so did, and we named certain infantry divisions in the first
category and same with armor, and we placed others in a second
category and yet others in a third. The 30th was among five
divisions in the first category.
However, we picked the 30th Division No. 1 on the list of first
category divisions. It was the combined judgment of the
approximately 35 historical officers who had worked on the records
and in the field that the 30th had merited this distinction. It was
our finding that the 30th had been outstanding in three operations
and that we could consistently recommend it for citation on any one
of these three occasions. It was further found that it had in no
single instance performed discreditably or weakly when considered
against the averages of the Theater and that in no single operation
had it carried less than its share of the burden or looked bad when
compared with the forces on its flanks. We were especially impressed
with the fact that it had consistently achieved results without
undue wastage of its men.
I do not know whether further honors will come to the 30th. I hope
they do. For we had to keep looking at the balance of things always
and we felt that the 30th was the outstanding infantry division in
the ETO.
Respectfully yours,

/s/S.L.A. Marshall
Colonel S.L.A. Marshall, GSC
Historian of ETO |