May 2, 2005 -
MSDC set for training troops
HOLTON – The Muscatatuck State Developmental Center, located
just west of Ripley County in Jennings County, was once the home of
hundreds of developmentally disabled persons. Built in 1920 as the Indiana
Farm Colony for Feeble Minded Youth, the facility encompasses 1,000 acres,
including a reservoir and summer camp and over 65 buildings, including a
five-story hospital; school; church; cafeteria; prison; laundry; water;
sewage and power plants; and dozens of other buildings, many two and three
stories high, that were used to house residents.
Several years ago the facility was ordered shut down and its residents
have been slowly placed in community settings. The facility will be
officially closed June 30, but will be reborn July 1 as the new
Muscatatuck Urban Training Center.
Brig. Gen. Clif Tooley, commander of the Indiana National Guard and
project leader for the new training center, spoke about it to a crowd of
over 130 people April 27 in Holton.
“We’re in the process of turning a vision and concept into a reality,” he
explained. “I think its important for the community to understand what the
purpose for this facility is. This is a complicated endeavor and involves
the bulk of southern Indiana.”
Tooley reminded everyone that the nation is at war with currently 3,000
Indiana National Guard soldiers in harm’s way around the globe. “The world
we live in today is tremendously different from what it was 10 to 15 years
ago. Sept. 11 redefined our role.”
Tooley said protecting the homeland is now a vital part of the military’s
job. Threats include chemical, biomedical, radiological, nuclear and cyber
terrorism. “You can’t counter these threats unless you first practice ....
No armed forces on the planet can stand up to us (U.S. military) in a
conventional fight. The problem is everyone knows that. They use
asymmetric warfare to attack us where we are most weak. “
The brigadier general reported that in the future, most fighting will be
in an urban environment. Up until now, the whole concept of military
training was based on fighting in an open area. With future wars likely
taking place in cities, both abroad and at home, the military has to
retrain and join forces with local governments, law enforcement and
emergency response crews.
The former home for the disabled will be a ready-built city-like
environment for urban warfare training purposes, explained Tooley. “From a
military perspective, it provides us with some unique capabilities.”
All the different buildings and grounds can be used to train troops,
police officers, firefighters, emergency medical personnel and a variety
of other agencies on how to respond to different types of terrorism and
hostage situations. Scenarios and simulation exercises can be many and
varied and vital air-to-ground training for pilots can be accomplished.
“Nowhere in the United States do we have a place to train to drop bombs in
an urban area without damaging everyone else,” Tooley commented. He noted
that because of this, in the raid on Fallujah, Iraq, several months ago,
pilots had to learn this skill on the job.
According to Tooley, U.S. Department of Defense urban training experts
have looked over the grounds and are extremely supportive of the state and
the Military Department of Indiana’s vision for the former developmental
center.
That vision is to have the new Muscatatuck Urban Training Center become
part of Camp Atterbury (near Columbus) and
together be the nation’s “premier regional homeland security and stability
operations collective training center; a critical part of the Department
of Defense’s joint national training capability and a full member of the
national domestic preparedness consortium.”
The vision also involves the contracted use of part of Big Oaks National
Wildlife Refuge for air landing space and training (already operational)
and the use of other regional grounds such as the Hoosier National Forest
in south central Indiana.
“Muscatatuck is linked to a larger thing and a greater entity. It makes
this an exciting thing for people at a national level to see people coming
together to provide training for our nation,” said the military leader.
According to Tooley, many of the nation’s existing bases have been victims
of urban encroachment, making expansion impossible and training
opportunities limited.
Camp Atterbury Joint Maneuver Training Center
currently has 30,000 acres and trains thousands of troops each year. It
was recently evaluated by the U.S. Army as being one of a few facilities
in the nation ranked high on a list of vital properties. “Technically,
Muscatatuck is going to become part of Camp Atterbury,” stated the project
leader. (Debbie
McIntyre, Batesville Herald
Tribune - Batesville,IN,USA)
May 13, 2005 -
Mayor dies after battling tumor

Franklin Mayor Norman P. Blankenship Jr.. died Thursday night from
complications from a cancerous brain tumor.
Blankenship, 57, died at 8:12 p.m. at
Johnson Memorial Hospital, said Franklin Police Chief John Borges.
"He was a good mayor and
a good friend," said Steve Hougland, president of the Franklin City
Council. "He was one of those people who was a stand-up guy."
Blankenship, a
Republican, was elected to his second four-year term in November 2003.
The tumor was diagnosed in December 2003, and the mayor had undergone
radiation treatments. Blankenship was admitted to the hospital April
21 after experiencing complications.
City government adapted
to Blankenship's condition and continued to function through the effort of
department heads and the city council, Borges said. The Blankenship
family was with the mayor as he passed away in his sleep, Borges said.
Survivors include his wife, Linda, and their two children.
"He was a fine man," said
Ron West, president of the Johnson County Council.
Before being elected to
his first term in 1999, Blankenship served 22 years on the Franklin Police
Department and was a former chief of that department.
He also was a member of
the Indiana Army National Guard, where he had served since 1979.
In February 2003,
Blankenship's Guard unit was called to active duty, though he was able to
serve in the unit at Camp Atterbury while
still fulfilling his city duties.
He was a member of
Franklin Masonic Lodge 107, American Legion Post 205, Air Commando
Association, Elks Lodge 1818, the Franklin Jaycees, the Aircraft Owners
and Pilots Association and the Johnson County Fraternal Order of Police.
He also was a member of the board of directors of Johnson County Senior
Services and the Indiana Association of Cities and Towns and was past
president of the South Central Mayors Roundtable and the Indiana
Conference of Mayors.
Normal functions of the
city executive branch will continue to be carried out by the department
heads, Borges said. Hougland continues to serve as city spokesman .
Republican precinct committee leaders eventually will select a new mayor,
Hougland said.
The Blankenship family
deeply appreciates the prayers, support and friendship of the Franklin
community during this difficult time, Borges said. Funeral
arrangements are pending and will be announced as soon as possible, he
said. Memorial
contributions can be made to the Johnson County Community Foundation, in
care of The Blankenship Family Patriotic Fund.
(Paul Bird and Kevin O'Neal , Indianapolis
Star - Indianapolis,IN,USA)
May 20, 2005 -
Indiana Guard receives award for training troops
The Indiana National
Guard received an Army award this week for Camp
Atterbury's mobilization efforts during the Iraq war and other
missions.
Camp Atterbury, a 33,000-acre base 25 miles south of Indianapolis,
has trained thousands of soldiers from Indiana and across the country.
The former camp
commander, Col. Kenneth Newlin, and other officials traveled to Washington
this week to accept the Army chief of staff's Combined Logistics
Deployment Excellence Award. The base was chosen for the award in the
National Guard supporting-unit category.
Newlin credited
Camp Atterbury's staff for the base's
transformation into a large-scale mobilization site since early 2003.
"It is amazing what these
soldiers have accomplished in so little time," he said in a news release.
"They literally established logistic functions from nothing more than some
rough plans, with initially only minimal and, in some areas, no supporting
infrastructure." (Indianapolis
Star - Indianapolis, IN, USA)
May 23, 2005 -
An Iraqi Police Officer's Death, a
Soldier's Varying Accounts
The American soldier and the Iraqi police officer were on patrol together
outside a flea market south of Baghdad, chatting from time to time, when
one of them suddenly started shooting.
What prompted the gunfire is a matter of dispute, but one thing is not:
The soldier, Cpl. Dustin M. Berg, fired three times at his Iraqi partner,
Hussein Kamel Hadi Dawood al-Zubeidi, and killed him. As Corporal Berg ran
away, he picked up Mr. Zubeidi's AK-47 and shot himself in the side.
In the days that followed, Corporal Berg lied about what happened, saying
Mr. Zubeidi was the one who had shot him. And for months he went right on
lying, after he recovered from his wound, after he left Iraq, even after
he received a Purple Heart he did not deserve with his parents watching at
a solemn ceremony back home in Indiana.
Corporal Berg has long acknowledged that he killed Mr. Zubeidi in a rush
of moments that day in November 2003, but says he did so only after the
officer abruptly raised his gun in a threatening way. Everything Corporal
Berg now admits doing wrong after that - shooting himself and lying about
the events - grew out of fear for what would happen to him, he says, and
the knowledge that other soldiers in his unit had already been
investigated for incidents in Iraq.
"I just didn't think anyone was going to believe me," Corporal Berg wrote
in his most recent sworn statement, "and I didn't want to get into trouble
for something I thought was the right thing to do."
Corporal Berg, a 22-year-old member of the Indiana National Guard, has
been charged with murder and is scheduled for another military hearing on
Monday. He is one of a handful of soldiers and marines who have been
accused in connection with the deaths of Iraqis and who say they were
acting in self-defense.
Unlike the prisoner abuses that have alarmed and riveted the public, these
lesser-known cases have created divisions over the definition of murder in
a fluid war zone. In Iraq, these stories have caused bitter resentment and
distrust of the troops. Among Americans, they have strained units, leaving
some Army supervisors saying troops seem reluctant to carry out their
duties, and have led to an outpouring of anger in hometowns across the
United States.
"These guys go out and do what their country asks them to do, and now
they're being told they did it wrong?" said Rich Hendrix, a Vietnam-era
veteran who spent a recent afternoon inside the American Legion Hall in
Ferdinand, Corporal Berg's hometown of 2,300 in Southern Indiana, where
residents overwhelmingly say they support him. "I say they're doing the
best they can. You can't even be sure who's your friend and who's your
enemy over there, so what are they supposed to do?"
Since the war in Iraq began more than two years ago, more than 20 American
soldiers and marines have been accused of crimes in connection with the
deaths of Iraqis, including the small number of cases in which service
members have claimed self-defense. Navy personnel are also being
investigated in the deaths of two detainees, though no charges have been
filed. At least 10 service members have been convicted, but in most cases
on less serious charges than those they originally faced.
No two wars are alike, making it impossible to compare these cases with
those of past conflicts, and some people with military experience disagree
over whether anything is different in the Iraq prosecutions.
'The Same Arguments'
In Vietnam, after a much longer involvement, 95 American soldiers and 27
marines were convicted of killing noncombatants. Gary D. Solis, who
teaches law at the United States Military Academy at West Point, said many
of those cases are similar to descriptions of killings in Iraq now being
prosecuted.
"Look, there are guys who go out and for whatever reason murder
defenseless people," Mr. Solis said. "They're crimes. And we're hearing
the same arguments now that we heard then: that in the fog of war, you
have to make instantaneous decisions. We heard exactly the same thing back
then."
In some of the 20 cases, prosecutors allege that flagrant acts led to
death. One soldier was convicted of murder in the death of a 17-year-old
Iraqi whom he allegedly had sex with in a guard tower. Four others are
accused of suffocating a detainee in a sleeping bag during an
interrogation. Another was accused of shooting an unarmed Iraqi as he ran
from a truck and, some witnesses said, waved a white cloth.
In other cases, service members have admitted their roles in the deaths,
but have claimed that their actions were akin to "mercy killings,"
striking final blows to wounded Iraqis who were suffering.
Difficult Cases
But perhaps the most contentious cases are those of the handful of service
members like Corporal Berg, who claim that they acted only to protect
themselves from what they considered threats to their lives, as allowed by
military rules. Some witnesses, however, say they saw something else
entirely.
A marine from New York says he shot and killed two Iraqis he had just
captured in a house raid because they made a hostile move in his
direction; but why, then, did he empty his weapon, reload and shoot some
more? A private from Louisiana said an Iraqi cowherd lunged toward another
soldier in a field, so he shot and killed him; but the unarmed cowherd was
in handcuffs, a fact, the soldier insisted, that he did not notice at
first.
Jack B. Zimmermann, a Texas lawyer who has defended service members in
similar cases and who also was a prosecutor and criminal judge in the
Marine Corps, said he considers these cases "the closer questions - the
troublesome ones."
And some military lawyers say they believe that those cases are being
investigated more often in this war. Perhaps, they say, round-the-clock
news media coverage of the fighting in Iraq has also meant increased
scrutiny. Perhaps such cases are simply more likely to arise in a war
complicated by urban combat and the fear of suicide bombers, hidden
explosives and an uncertain enemy.
"In earlier wars, I don't think some of these homicide cases would be
prosecuted at all," said Guy L. Womack, a Houston lawyer and retired
Marine lieutenant colonel who prosecuted marines and has represented the
Army reservist accused of being the ringleader of prisoner abuse at Abu
Ghraib. "We're second-guessing things we don't need to second-guess."
In Iraq, criminal investigations like the one into Corporal Berg's
shooting left a strange mark on other soldiers, acknowledged Capt. Rodney
J. Shambarger, one of Corporal Berg's supervisors.
Some of the soldiers told Captain Shambarger that they felt "less apt" to
fire their weapons for fear of being investigated themselves, according to
a summary of the captain's sworn testimony at a hearing in Corporal Berg's
case. On a few occasions, he said, the soldiers seemed to stop following
the military rules of engagement. In one incident, a soldier watched as a
vehicle ran a checkpoint, but he did not fire his weapon.
Captain Shambarger says Corporal Berg had a good reputation in his Guard
unit, made up of soldiers from Ferdinand and the nearby town of Jasper. He
was calm and quiet and did his job, the captain said, a "10 soldier" on a
scale of 1 to 10. He was not the kind who was a "thrill seeker," nor was
he a hotshot looking to return from war with a pile of medals.
A Young Soldier
In 2002, when Dustin Berg left for basic training at Fort Benning, Ga., he
was the first of four brothers to go anywhere much beyond Ferdinand, a
town with mostly German roots and a place so precisely kept up that one
resident describes Thursday as "mowing day."
Looking back, Mary Lee Berg said she never had an inkling that her son
might want to become a soldier. But at 17, while he was still studying at
Forest Park High School and was busy with pole vaulting and the FFA,
Dustin asked her to sign a waiver that would let him join the military
before his 18th birthday.
Ms. Berg said no; a year later, he did not need her signature.
After he arrived in Iraq in early 2003, Corporal Berg's phone calls home
were upbeat, full of stories about the enormous rooms and gold bathroom
appliances in Saddam Hussein's palaces, his mother said. But he also told
of a rugged existence for his unit, simple netting to sleep under and a
child's wading pool in lieu of a shower.
That November, a soldier arrived at Ms. Berg's home with alarming news:
Corporal Berg had been hit by small arms fire, presumably from the enemy,
during a security mission.
Ms. Berg said she never asked her son much about what happened. A
counselor trained to help military families told her not to push or pry.
So she let it alone, even when he came home a few months later and even
after he and three other members of the First Battalion, 152nd Infantry
drove three hours to Camp Atterbury to be
pinned with Purple Hearts, decorations meant for those wounded in combat.
Accounts of a Shooting
Capt. Dan Stigall, the Army's prosecutor at Fort Knox in Corporal Berg's
case, declined to be interviewed for this article, and Connie Shaffery, a
spokeswoman for Fort Knox, said prosecutors would not provide documents,
besides basic charging papers, because the case is continuing. But
summarized transcripts of sworn testimony from a February Article 32
hearing, the military's equivalent of a grand jury proceeding, and copies
of Corporal Berg's most recent sworn statement to an Army investigator
offer a glimpse of the case from both sides.
On Nov. 23, 2003, behind a village flea market, Corporal Berg fired three
rounds from his weapon, he wrote in the statement, striking Mr. Zubeidi in
the head and chest. Corporal Berg then took Mr. Zubeidi's gun and shot
himself in the left side.
Moments later, Corporal Berg ran from the area, toward several soldiers,
holding his wound and screaming that he did not want to die, Sgt. First
Class Joseph Milton said in sworn testimony. Sergeant Milton said he kept
asking who had shot him, but Corporal Berg was rambling, emotional and
nearly in tears. He spoke of a man in a red turban and a white "man
dress." As he bled, he never mentioned the Iraqi police officer, Sergeant
Milton said.
In the months that followed, Corporal Berg provided military investigators
with conflicting descriptions of what happened. At first, he told them
that Mr. Zubeidi shot him before he fired his weapon. Other times, he said
he shot first and Mr. Zubeidi returned fire.
Then in June 2004, Corporal Berg said he wanted to "clear up the facts"
and admitted to investigators that he had fired all the shots, including
the one into his own side.
In that sworn, written statement, Corporal Berg described working the
patrol shift with Mr. Zubeidi. They talked about their lives in Iraq and
in the United States, about weapons and knives - "all kinds of stuff,"
Corporal Berg wrote. Then, Corporal Berg said, he saw the man in a red
turban and white "man dress," a description that his lawyer said was
similar to that of a suspected insurgent reported in the area a day
before.
But when Corporal Berg told Mr. Zubeidi that he was going to radio the
man's description so it could be investigated, he said Mr. Zubeidi said,
"No, my friend."
Corporal Berg said he reached for his radio anyway, and saw Mr. Zubeidi
lift his weapon. "His face turned blank and his eyes looked vicious,"
Corporal Berg wrote. "I thought he was going to kill me." So, he said, he
began firing. He said he started to run away, but stopped at the police
officer's weapon, which was lying on the ground, and started to panic
about how the military might view the shooting and shot himself.
Before Corporal Berg's shooting, Captain Shambarger said, three other
soldiers in his unit were investigated for various incidents, leaving
others tense. In other units, too, service members say they are wondering
how the military is deciding which cases to try and which to drop. A
marine captured on videotape killing an unarmed Iraqi in a mosque in
Fallujah was cleared this month, while Second Lt. Ilario Pantano, a
marine, is waiting to find out whether his shooting of the two Iraqis
after a house raid will go to a court-martial or will be dropped, as
advised by a hearing officer this month.
Other Investigations
As of late April, Army officials said they had opened 367 investigations
into alleged abuse or homicide in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2002. Of
those, 218 had been resolved, including 35 courts-martial and 105
administrative or other nonjudicial punishments against 129 soldiers.
In the case of Corporal Berg, he is charged with unpremeditated murder,
multiple counts of false swearing, a false official statement, wounding
himself in a combat zone and wearing a medal he did not qualify for.
Special Agent Clarence Joubert, an Army investigator who questioned
Corporal Berg, probed one possible motive in the shooting. He asked
Corporal Berg whether it was true that he had asked other Iraqi police
officers to shoot him, so he could return to the United States.
Corporal Berg said no: "That was never said."
"I shot myself 'cause I was scared of what was going to happen to me with
the military," Corporal Berg wrote in his statement. "It was not because
of medals, drugs or even because it was maybe a way out of the desert."
Corporal Berg now stands at the edge of two paths.
One leads through Fort Knox, where he has been required to live and work
on weekdays while awaiting his hearing and perhaps a formal court-martial.
If convicted, he could face life in prison.
The other goes back to Ferdinand, where he and his fiancée were married in
front of 400 guests last weekend, and where a mortgage has been signed, a
baby is on the way and his boss insists that his old job upholstering
furniture is still available at Best Chairs Inc.
The
Ledger - Lakeland,FL,USA
May 24,
2005 - Indiana Guardsman Says He
Shot Iraqi Officer In Self-Defense
FORT KNOX, Ky. -- An Indiana National Guard
soldier charged with murdering an Iraqi police officer admitted Monday
to the shooting, but said it was self-defense.
Cpl. Dustin Berg, 22, of Ferdinand, Ind.,
said the Iraqi officer pointed a gun at him to stop him from reporting
possible insurgent activity.
"I thought I was going to die," Berg
said during a hearing at Fort Knox. "I felt I had no choice but to fear
for my life."In unsworn
testimony, Berg also admitted shooting himself after killing the Iraqi.
Berg said he picked up the Iraqi's automatic AK-47 and shot himself in
the stomach in an attempt to give the impression of a firefight and
preclude an investigation into the Iraqi officer's death.
Monday's hearing, the military
equivalent of a grand jury, was to decide if Berg will face charges of
shooting himself and lying about the incident. Hearing officer Maj.
Samuel Butzbach will recommend to Fort Knox Commander Maj. General Terry
Tucker whether Berg should face the additional charges.
A court martial on the murder charge was
scheduled for July 25. The charges stem from a shooting in November 2003
when Berg was a member of the Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st
Battalion, 152 Infantry, a National Guard unit from Jasper, Ind.
During his testimony Monday, Berg
recounted being on patrol with the Iraqi police officer at a base about
90 minutes outside of Baghdad, Iraq. While on patrol, Berg said, he saw
a man in a red turban and white outfit matching the description of
someone the military had been looking for.
Berg said when he tried to call in the
man's location, the Iraqi police officer, who had been "like a puppy
following us around," said "no, my friend" several times before pointing
the AK-47 at him.
"I looked up and saw the most God-awful
face I've seen in my whole life," Berg said. "He looked like a whole
different person."Berg
said he feared for his life, then shot the man three times. Witnesses at
the hearing in February said the police officer was shot in the head,
chest and arm.
Berg said he then picked up the Iraqi's
machine gun and shot himself in the stomach. That shooting was an
attempt to limit any questions about the shooting of the police officer
out of fear of a military investigation where there were no witnesses to
back him up, Berg said.
The military had been investigating nearly every shooting, making
soldiers nervous about getting into trouble, Berg said.
"It just seemed like everything we did
there, we couldn't win for losing," he said. "I thought it would just
blow over."After shooting
himself, Berg ran toward the base, said Sgt. 1st Class Joseph Milton,
who also testified Monday. Berg said a possible insurgent -- a man in a
red turban -- shot him, but did not mention the dead Iraqi police
officer, Milton said.
Capt. Dan Stigall, who is prosecuting
the case, said Berg stuck with that story until 2004, when he admitted
to killing the Iraqi police officer.
"He lied about this incident repeatedly,
over and over again," Stigall said.
Berg's civilian attorney, Charles
Gittins of Middletown, Va., said the soldier lied about shooting
himself, but had no reason to kill the Iraqi police officer if he wasn't
being threatened."I don't
think you second guess a soldier in that situation," Gittins said. "He
had a legal excuse to use deadly force."
Berg, who was charged in the case on
Jan. 13, has since been put on active duty and assigned to Fort Knox.
Before Monday's hearing, the Army
dropped two charges against Berg. One was for wearing an unauthorized
Purple Heart for combat injuries, the other for making a false
statement.
Fort Knox spokeswoman Connie Shaffery
said the military authorized the Purple Heart before finding out that
Berg shot himself, making him ineligible for the award. The false
statement charge was dismissed because Berg was not on active duty when
he made the statement, meaning he could not be charged under military
law.
INDYchannel.com - Indianapolis,IN,USA
|